Best Known (88−45, 88, s)-Nets in Base 64
(88−45, 88, 513)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 88, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 88, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
(88−45, 88, 1189)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (43, 88, 1189)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(6488, 1189, F64, 45) (dual of [1189, 1101, 46]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6488, 1369, F64, 45) (dual of [1369, 1281, 46]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(6487, 1368, F64, 45) (dual of [1368, 1281, 46]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(44) ⊂ Ce(43) [i] based on
- linear OA(6487, 1366, F64, 45) (dual of [1366, 1279, 46]-code), using an extension Ce(44) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1365 | 642−1, defining interval I = [1,44], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
- linear OA(6485, 1366, F64, 44) (dual of [1366, 1281, 45]-code), using an extension Ce(43) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1365 | 642−1, defining interval I = [1,43], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 44 [i]
- linear OA(640, 2, F64, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(640, s, F64, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(44) ⊂ Ce(43) [i] based on
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(6487, 1368, F64, 45) (dual of [1368, 1281, 46]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6488, 1369, F64, 45) (dual of [1369, 1281, 46]-code), using
(88−45, 88, 1995863)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 88, 1995864)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 87, 1995864)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 13 729610 482149 444395 364987 990171 390582 566017 223017 971814 669317 252489 875802 722040 894767 291532 001655 822007 793573 143679 937162 189449 741286 336221 868710 370284 695355 > 6487 [i]