Best Known (16, 16+52, s)-Nets in Base 64
(16, 16+52, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (16, 68, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 68, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(16, 16+52, 216)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(16, 68, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
(16, 16+52, 267)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (16, 68, 267)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 267, using
(16, 16+52, 8854)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (16, 68, 8855)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 661 587212 484701 421573 218291 928390 897309 696877 819781 969361 468927 369384 958242 944852 641495 916908 361758 534145 068117 296788 094736 > 6468 [i]