MinT - Best Known (74−53, 74, s)-Nets in Base 64

Best Known (74−53, 74, s)-Nets in Base 64

(74−53, 74, 177)-Net over F₆₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (21, 74, 177)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 74, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
    - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(74−53, 74, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive

(21, 74, 288)-net in base 64, using

10 times m-reduction [i] based on (21, 84, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 72, 288)-net over F₁₂₈, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(74−53, 74, 342)-Net over F₆₄ — Digital

Digital (21, 74, 342)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 74, 342)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(74−53, 74, 19718)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s

There is no (21, 74, 19719)-net in base 64, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (21, 73, 19719)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64^mÂ â‰¥ 710612 936473 688293 753668 733538 000965 773729 824939 352025 209973 808932 636373 670115 447880 699701 300219 521819 344181 847690 637228 355837 510304 > 64⁷³ [i]