Best Known (8−6, 8, s)-Nets in Base 64
(8−6, 8, 80)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (2, 8, 80)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (1, 8, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
(8−6, 8, 97)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (2, 8, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
(8−6, 8, 257)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(2, 8, 257)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 6, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
(8−6, 8, 1889)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (2, 8, 1890)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 281 823792 021136 > 648 [i]