MinT - Best Known (26, 26+63, s)-Nets in Base 64

Best Known (26, 26+63, s)-Nets in Base 64

(26, 26+63, 177)-Net over F₆₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (26, 89, 177)-net over F₆₄, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 89, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
    - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(26, 26+63, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive

(26, 89, 288)-net in base 64, using

t-expansion [i] based on (22, 89, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F₁₂₈, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(26, 26+63, 425)-Net over F₆₄ — Digital

Digital (26, 89, 425)-net over F₆₄, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 424)-sequence over F₆₄, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 425, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(26, 26+63, 26403)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s

There is no (26, 89, 26404)-net in base 64, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 88, 26404)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64^mÂ â‰¥ 879 412678 515866 575072 485100 326475 449439 566488 024012 792146 331220 169844 749272 885918 481116 549644 413390 303372 057295 659469 586298 171765 755164 513158 602501 059389 902904 > 64⁸⁸ [i]