Best Known (82−64, 82, s)-Nets in Base 64
(82−64, 82, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(82−64, 82, 216)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(18, 82, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 91, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 78, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 78, 216)-net over F128, using
(82−64, 82, 281)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (18, 82, 281)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 280)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 281, using
(82−64, 82, 8611)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 82, 8612)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 12818 981948 065030 425269 478388 036783 832819 915451 408435 385605 762863 807669 437535 373511 659824 792624 088515 100316 232537 622478 067509 130222 109806 710849 743445 > 6482 [i]