Best Known (24, 24+7, s)-Nets in Base 64
(24, 24+7, 3066602)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 31, 3066602)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6431, 3066602, F64, 9, 7) (dual of [(3066602, 9), 27599387, 8]-NRT-code), using
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(6431, 3066603, F64, 3, 7) (dual of [(3066603, 3), 9199778, 8]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(646, 270402, F64, 3, 3) (dual of [(270402, 3), 811200, 4]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(646, 270402, F64, 2, 3) (dual of [(270402, 2), 540798, 4]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(6425, 2796201, F64, 3, 7) (dual of [(2796201, 3), 8388578, 8]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(6425, large, F64, 7) (dual of [large, large−25, 8]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 648−1, defining interval I = [0,3], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−3,−2,…,3}|+1 = 8 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 3-folding [i] based on linear OA(6425, large, F64, 7) (dual of [large, large−25, 8]-code), using
- linear OOA(646, 270402, F64, 3, 3) (dual of [(270402, 3), 811200, 4]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(6431, 3066603, F64, 3, 7) (dual of [(3066603, 3), 9199778, 8]-NRT-code), using
(24, 24+7, large)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (24, 31, large)-net over F64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (24, 33, large)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(6433, large, F64, 9) (dual of [large, large−33, 10]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 648−1, defining interval I = [0,4], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−4,−3,…,4}|+1 = 10 (BCH-bound) [i]
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(6433, large, F64, 9) (dual of [large, large−33, 10]-code), using
(24, 24+7, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 31, large)-net in base 64, because
- 5 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 26, large)-net in base 64, but