Best Known (4, 4+8, s)-Nets in Base 64
(4, 4+8, 130)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (4, 12, 130)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 4, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (0, 8, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64 (see above)
- digital (0, 4, 65)-net over F64, using
(4, 4+8, 258)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(4, 12, 258)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 9, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
(4, 4+8, 289)-Net in Base 64
(4, 12, 289)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 9, 289)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 288)-sequence over F256, using
(4, 4+8, 9208)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (4, 12, 9209)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 4723 846141 950590 819914 > 6412 [i]