Best Known (13−9, 13, s)-Nets in Base 64
(13−9, 13, 130)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (4, 13, 130)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 4, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (0, 9, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64 (see above)
- digital (0, 4, 65)-net over F64, using
(13−9, 13, 257)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(4, 13, 257)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (4, 16, 257)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 12, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 12, 257)-net over F256, using
(13−9, 13, 9208)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (4, 13, 9209)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (4, 12, 9209)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 4723 846141 950590 819914 > 6412 [i]