MinT - Best Known (9, 16, s)-Nets in Base 64

Best Known (9, 16, s)-Nets in Base 64

(9, 16, 4160)-Net over F₆₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (9, 16, 4160)-net over F₆₄, using

generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
  - s-reduction based on digital (0, 0, s)-net over F₆₄ with arbitrarily large s, using
    - arbitrary set of 64⁰ points [i]
2. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
3. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
4. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
5. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
6. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
7. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
8. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
9. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
10. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
11. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
12. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
13. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
14. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
15. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
16. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
17. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
18. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
19. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
20. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
21. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
22. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
23. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
24. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
25. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
26. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
27. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
28. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
29. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
30. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
31. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
32. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
33. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
34. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
35. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
36. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
37. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
38. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
39. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
40. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
41. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
42. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
43. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
44. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
45. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
46. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
47. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
48. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
49. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
50. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
51. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
52. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
53. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
54. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
55. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
56. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
57. digital (0, 0, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
58. digital (0, 1, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
  - s-reduction based on digital (0, 1, s)-net over F₆₄ with arbitrarily large s, using
    - construction for strength kÂ =Â 1 [i]
59. digital (0, 1, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
60. digital (0, 1, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
61. digital (0, 1, 65)-net over F₆₄ (see above)
62. digital (0, 2, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
  - kÂ =Â 2 construction [i]
63. digital (0, 3, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F₆₄, using
    - generalized Faure sequence [i]
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
      - the rational function field F₆₄(x) [i]
    - Niederreiter sequence [i]
64. digital (0, 7, 65)-net over F₆₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F₆₄ (see above)

(9, 16, 4511)-Net over F₆₄ — Digital

Digital (9, 16, 4511)-net over F₆₄, using

embedding of OOA with Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(64¹⁶, 4511, F₆₄, 7) (dual of [4511, 4495, 8]-code), using
- 410 step VarÅ¡amovâ€“Edel lengthening with (r_i)Â = (2, 35 times 0, 1, 373 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(64¹³, 4098, F₆₄, 7) (dual of [4098, 4085, 8]-code), using
  - constructionÂ X applied to C_e(6) âŠ‚ C_e(5) [i] based on
    1. linear OA(64¹³, 4096, F₆₄, 7) (dual of [4096, 4083, 8]-code), using an extension C_e(6) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095Â = 64²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,6], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 7 [i]
    2. linear OA(64¹¹, 4096, F₆₄, 6) (dual of [4096, 4085, 7]-code), using an extension C_e(5) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095Â = 64²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,5], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 6 [i]
    3. linear OA(64⁰, 2, F₆₄, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
      - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(64⁰, s, F₆₄, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
        OA with only one run / dual of code without redundancy [i]

(9, 16, 5461)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive

(9, 16, 5461)-net in base 64, using

net defined by OOA [i] based on OOA(64¹⁶, 5461, S₆₄, 7, 7), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on OA(64¹⁶, 16384, S₆₄, 7), using
  - discarding factors based on OA(64¹⁶, 16386, S₆₄, 7), using
    - discarding parts of the base [i] based on linear OA(128¹³, 16386, F₁₂₈, 7) (dual of [16386, 16373, 8]-code), using
      - constructionÂ X applied to C_e(6) âŠ‚ C_e(5) [i] based on
        linear OA(128¹³, 16384, F₁₂₈, 7) (dual of [16384, 16371, 8]-code), using an extension C_e(6) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383Â = 128²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,6], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 7 [i]
        linear OA(128¹¹, 16384, F₁₂₈, 6) (dual of [16384, 16373, 7]-code), using an extension C_e(5) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383Â = 128²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,5], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 6 [i]
        linear OA(128⁰, 2, F₁₂₈, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
        discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(128⁰, s, F₁₂₈, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
        OA with only one run / dual of code without redundancy [i]

(9, 16, 8192)-Net in Base 64

(9, 16, 8192)-net in base 64, using

net defined by OOA [i] based on OOA(64¹⁶, 8192, S₆₄, 9, 7), using
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on OOA(64¹⁶, 8193, S₆₄, 3, 7), using
  - discarding parts of the base [i] based on linear OOA(128¹³, 8193, F₁₂₈, 3, 7) (dual of [(8193, 3), 24566, 8]-NRT-code), using
    - embedding of OOA with Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OOA(128¹³, 8193, F₁₂₈, 2, 7) (dual of [(8193, 2), 16373, 8]-NRT-code), using
      - OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(128¹³, 16386, F₁₂₈, 7) (dual of [16386, 16373, 8]-code), using
        constructionÂ X applied to C_e(6) âŠ‚ C_e(5) [i] based on
        linear OA(128¹³, 16384, F₁₂₈, 7) (dual of [16384, 16371, 8]-code), using an extension C_e(6) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383Â = 128²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,6], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 7 [i]
        linear OA(128¹¹, 16384, F₁₂₈, 6) (dual of [16384, 16373, 7]-code), using an extension C_e(5) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383Â = 128²âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [1,5], and designed minimum distance dÂ â‰¥Â |I|+1Â =Â 6 [i]
        linear OA(128⁰, 2, F₁₂₈, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
        discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(128⁰, s, F₁₂₈, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
        OA with only one run / dual of code without redundancy [i]

(9, 16, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s

There is no (9, 16, large)-net in base 64, because

5 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 11, large)-net in base 64, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]