Best Known (8, 20, s)-Nets in Base 64
(8, 20, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (8, 20, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 20, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(8, 20, 190)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (8, 20, 190)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(6420, 190, F64, 12) (dual of [190, 170, 13]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6420, 195, F64, 12) (dual of [195, 175, 13]-code), using
(8, 20, 260)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(8, 20, 260)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 15, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
(8, 20, 321)-Net in Base 64
(8, 20, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (8, 24, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 18, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 18, 321)-net over F256, using
(8, 20, 49826)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (8, 20, 49827)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 1 329336 578683 237635 212942 778445 943848 > 6420 [i]