Best Known (9, 22, s)-Nets in Base 64
(9, 22, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 22, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 22, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(9, 22, 209)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (9, 22, 209)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 208)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 209, using
(9, 22, 260)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(9, 22, 260)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 24, 260)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 18, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 18, 260)-net over F256, using
(9, 22, 321)-Net in Base 64
(9, 22, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 28, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 321)-net over F256, using
(9, 22, 99655)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 22, 99656)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 21, 99656)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 85 074492 468930 506965 847933 249663 325943 > 6421 [i]