Best Known (15, 36, s)-Nets in Base 64
(15, 36, 193)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 36, 193)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 10, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (5, 26, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (0, 10, 65)-net over F64, using
(15, 36, 260)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (15, 36, 260)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(6436, 260, F64, 21) (dual of [260, 224, 22]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6436, 263, F64, 21) (dual of [263, 227, 22]-code), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,234P) ⊂ AG(F,238P) [i] based on
- linear OA(6433, 256, F64, 21) (dual of [256, 223, 22]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,234P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- linear OA(6429, 256, F64, 17) (dual of [256, 227, 18]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,238P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 257 (see above)
- linear OA(643, 7, F64, 3) (dual of [7, 4, 4]-code or 7-arc in PG(2,64) or 7-cap in PG(2,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(643, 64, F64, 3) (dual of [64, 61, 4]-code or 64-arc in PG(2,64) or 64-cap in PG(2,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(61,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(643, 64, F64, 3) (dual of [64, 61, 4]-code or 64-arc in PG(2,64) or 64-cap in PG(2,64)), using
- construction X applied to AG(F,234P) ⊂ AG(F,238P) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6436, 263, F64, 21) (dual of [263, 227, 22]-code), using
(15, 36, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(15, 36, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 42, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 36, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 36, 288)-net over F128, using
(15, 36, 321)-Net in Base 64
(15, 36, 321)-net in base 64, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 52, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 39, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 39, 321)-net over F256, using
(15, 36, 150748)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 36, 150749)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 35, 150749)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 1645 587848 124662 384640 561660 703037 789195 753453 991315 079828 847446 > 6435 [i]