Best Known (18, 64, s)-Nets in Base 64
(18, 64, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 64, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 64, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(18, 64, 259)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(18, 64, 259)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 48, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
(18, 64, 281)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (18, 64, 281)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 280)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 281, using
(18, 64, 321)-Net in Base 64
(18, 64, 321)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 48, 321)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 320)-sequence over F256, using
(18, 64, 15874)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 64, 15875)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 39 436790 843423 415893 115217 683270 760417 944613 304099 723540 748485 331188 116173 447308 564932 424132 221118 193559 016705 368576 > 6464 [i]