Best Known (22, 68, s)-Nets in Base 64
(22, 68, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (22, 68, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 68, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(22, 68, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(22, 68, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
(22, 68, 342)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (22, 68, 342)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (20, 68, 342)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 342, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 341)-sequence over F64, using
(22, 68, 32732)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (22, 68, 32733)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 661 422802 232208 542293 194809 250028 494861 535310 030235 604937 773049 635152 458163 013202 216739 577710 121452 551320 632325 820434 575160 > 6468 [i]