Best Known (26, 74, s)-Nets in Base 64
(26, 74, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 74, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 74, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(26, 74, 288)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(26, 74, 288)-net in base 64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (22, 74, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
(26, 74, 425)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (26, 74, 425)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 424)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 425, using
(26, 74, 57675)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 74, 57676)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 45 446192 055503 580943 345569 500024 138730 297692 752644 682130 619616 686899 656889 239685 266724 964530 696736 330020 727138 094048 532883 147176 239876 > 6474 [i]