Best Known (59, 76, s)-Nets in Base 64
(59, 76, 1048679)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (59, 76, 1048679)-net over F64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 11, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- digital (48, 65, 1048575)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6465, 1048575, F64, 17, 17) (dual of [(1048575, 17), 17825710, 18]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6465, 8388601, F64, 17) (dual of [8388601, 8388536, 18]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6465, large, F64, 17) (dual of [large, large−65, 18]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 648−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6465, large, F64, 17) (dual of [large, large−65, 18]-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6465, 8388601, F64, 17) (dual of [8388601, 8388536, 18]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6465, 1048575, F64, 17, 17) (dual of [(1048575, 17), 17825710, 18]-NRT-code), using
- digital (3, 11, 104)-net over F64, using
(59, 76, 1048832)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(59, 76, 1048832)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 57, 1048832)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 8, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (32, 49, 1048575)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25649, 1048575, F256, 17, 17) (dual of [(1048575, 17), 17825726, 18]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25649, 8388601, F256, 17) (dual of [8388601, 8388552, 18]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25649, large, F256, 17) (dual of [large, large−49, 18]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 2563−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 18 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25649, large, F256, 17) (dual of [large, large−49, 18]-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25649, 8388601, F256, 17) (dual of [8388601, 8388552, 18]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25649, 1048575, F256, 17, 17) (dual of [(1048575, 17), 17825726, 18]-NRT-code), using
- digital (0, 8, 257)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(59, 76, large)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (59, 76, large)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (57, 76, large)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(6476, large, F64, 19) (dual of [large, large−76, 20]-code), using
- 3 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(6473, large, F64, 19) (dual of [large, large−73, 20]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 648−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 3 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(6473, large, F64, 19) (dual of [large, large−73, 20]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(6476, large, F64, 19) (dual of [large, large−76, 20]-code), using
(59, 76, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (59, 76, large)-net in base 64, because
- 15 times m-reduction [i] would yield (59, 61, large)-net in base 64, but