Best Known (15, 82, s)-Nets in Base 64
(15, 82, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(15, 82, 192)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(15, 82, 192)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 84, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 72, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 72, 192)-net over F128, using
(15, 82, 258)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (15, 82, 258)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 257)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 258, using
(15, 82, 5650)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 82, 5651)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 81, 5651)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 200 220750 562399 488418 115287 786871 345617 309160 180025 223074 106782 645463 669639 369389 451527 470946 412462 729983 103440 441958 813858 840513 076778 648954 214432 > 6481 [i]