Best Known (57, 86, s)-Nets in Base 64
(57, 86, 18725)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 86, 18725)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6486, 18725, F64, 29, 29) (dual of [(18725, 29), 542939, 30]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 14-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6486, 262151, F64, 29) (dual of [262151, 262065, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6486, 262152, F64, 29) (dual of [262152, 262066, 30]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,14]) ⊂ C([0,13]) [i] based on
- linear OA(6485, 262145, F64, 29) (dual of [262145, 262060, 30]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262145 | 646−1, defining interval I = [0,14], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−14,−13,…,14}|+1 = 30 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(6479, 262145, F64, 27) (dual of [262145, 262066, 28]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262145 | 646−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−13,−12,…,13}|+1 = 28 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(641, 7, F64, 1) (dual of [7, 6, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(641, s, F64, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,14]) ⊂ C([0,13]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6486, 262152, F64, 29) (dual of [262152, 262066, 30]-code), using
- OOA 14-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(6486, 262151, F64, 29) (dual of [262151, 262065, 30]-code), using
(57, 86, 114619)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (57, 86, 114619)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(6486, 114619, F64, 2, 29) (dual of [(114619, 2), 229152, 30]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(6486, 131076, F64, 2, 29) (dual of [(131076, 2), 262066, 30]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(6486, 262152, F64, 29) (dual of [262152, 262066, 30]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,14]) ⊂ C([0,13]) [i] based on
- linear OA(6485, 262145, F64, 29) (dual of [262145, 262060, 30]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262145 | 646−1, defining interval I = [0,14], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−14,−13,…,14}|+1 = 30 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(6479, 262145, F64, 27) (dual of [262145, 262066, 28]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262145 | 646−1, defining interval I = [0,13], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−13,−12,…,13}|+1 = 28 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(641, 7, F64, 1) (dual of [7, 6, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(641, s, F64, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,14]) ⊂ C([0,13]) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(6486, 262152, F64, 29) (dual of [262152, 262066, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(6486, 131076, F64, 2, 29) (dual of [(131076, 2), 262066, 30]-NRT-code), using
(57, 86, large)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 86, large)-net in base 64, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 59, large)-net in base 64, but