Best Known (17, 91, s)-Nets in Base 64
(17, 91, 177)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 91, 177)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (7, 91, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
(17, 91, 192)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(17, 91, 192)-net in base 64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (16, 91, 192)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 78, 192)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 192, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 191)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (3, 78, 192)-net over F128, using
(17, 91, 267)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (17, 91, 267)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (16, 91, 267)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 267, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 266)-sequence over F64, using
(17, 91, 6420)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 91, 6421)-net in base 64, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 231 517872 012540 301048 139421 422546 829154 206005 027582 232432 859702 752464 744669 592625 073000 897495 480567 352164 058415 445856 416420 226432 633575 306757 193489 811188 119129 073792 > 6491 [i]