Best Known (46, 91, s)-Nets in Base 64
(46, 91, 513)-Net over F64 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 91, 513)-net over F64, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 91, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
(46, 91, 514)-Net in Base 64 — Constructive
(46, 91, 514)-net in base 64, using
- 641 times duplication [i] based on (45, 90, 514)-net in base 64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- (8, 30, 257)-net in base 64, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (8, 32, 257)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 24, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 24, 257)-net over F256, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (8, 32, 257)-net in base 64, using
- (15, 60, 257)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 45, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 45, 257)-net over F256, using
- (8, 30, 257)-net in base 64, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(46, 91, 1741)-Net over F64 — Digital
Digital (46, 91, 1741)-net over F64, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(6491, 1741, F64, 2, 45) (dual of [(1741, 2), 3391, 46]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(6491, 2052, F64, 2, 45) (dual of [(2052, 2), 4013, 46]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(6491, 4104, F64, 45) (dual of [4104, 4013, 46]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(44) ⊂ Ce(41) [i] based on
- linear OA(6489, 4096, F64, 45) (dual of [4096, 4007, 46]-code), using an extension Ce(44) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,44], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
- linear OA(6483, 4096, F64, 42) (dual of [4096, 4013, 43]-code), using an extension Ce(41) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,41], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 42 [i]
- linear OA(642, 8, F64, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(642, 64, F64, 2) (dual of [64, 62, 3]-code or 64-arc in PG(1,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(62,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(642, 64, F64, 2) (dual of [64, 62, 3]-code or 64-arc in PG(1,64)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(44) ⊂ Ce(41) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(6491, 4104, F64, 45) (dual of [4104, 4013, 46]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(6491, 2052, F64, 2, 45) (dual of [(2052, 2), 4013, 46]-NRT-code), using
(46, 91, 3519080)-Net in Base 64 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 91, 3519081)-net in base 64, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 90, 3519081)-net in base 64, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 3 599140 027082 701157 407562 583348 795524 838256 773164 625638 629632 968549 110278 653147 483190 701797 370226 572187 634077 682941 725699 645490 616734 807514 223154 902191 677359 165944 > 6490 [i]