Best Known (84, 84+26, s)-Nets in Base 7
(84, 84+26, 699)-Net over F7 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 110, 699)-net over F7, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 16, 11)-net over F7, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 10)-sequence over F7, using
- Niederreiter sequence (Bratley–Fox–Niederreiter implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- digital (68, 94, 688)-net over F7, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 47, 344)-net over F49, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 343)-sequence over F49, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 344, using
- the Hermitian function field over F49 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F49 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 344, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 343)-sequence over F49, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 47, 344)-net over F49, using
- digital (3, 16, 11)-net over F7, using
(84, 84+26, 8882)-Net over F7 — Digital
Digital (84, 110, 8882)-net over F7, using
(84, 84+26, large)-Net in Base 7 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 110, large)-net in base 7, because
- 24 times m-reduction [i] would yield (84, 86, large)-net in base 7, but