Best Known (16−5, 16, s)-Nets in Base 7
(16−5, 16, 2360)-Net over F7 — Constructive and digital
Digital (11, 16, 2360)-net over F7, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(716, 2360, F7, 6, 5) (dual of [(2360, 6), 14144, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(716, 2361, F7, 2, 5) (dual of [(2361, 2), 4706, 6]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(72, 8, F7, 2, 2) (dual of [(8, 2), 14, 3]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;14,7) [i]
- linear OOA(714, 2353, F7, 2, 5) (dual of [(2353, 2), 4692, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(714, 4706, F7, 5) (dual of [4706, 4692, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(497, 2353, F49, 5) (dual of [2353, 2346, 6]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(714, 4706, F7, 5) (dual of [4706, 4692, 6]-code), using
- linear OOA(72, 8, F7, 2, 2) (dual of [(8, 2), 14, 3]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- OOA stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(716, 2361, F7, 2, 5) (dual of [(2361, 2), 4706, 6]-NRT-code), using
(16−5, 16, 4714)-Net over F7 — Digital
Digital (11, 16, 4714)-net over F7, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(716, 4714, F7, 5) (dual of [4714, 4698, 6]-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OA(72, 8, F7, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(6,7) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,7) [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F, Q+1P) with degQ = 3 and degPÂ =Â 2 [i] based on function field F/F7 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 8, using the rational function field F7(x) [i]
- linear OA(714, 4706, F7, 5) (dual of [4706, 4692, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(497, 2353, F49, 5) (dual of [2353, 2346, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(72, 8, F7, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,7)), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(16−5, 16, 513568)-Net in Base 7 — Upper bound on s
There is no (11, 16, 513569)-net in base 7, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (11, 15, 513569)-net in base 7, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 7m ≥ 4 747571 526769 > 715 [i]