Best Known (64, 64+109, s)-Nets in Base 8
(64, 64+109, 98)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 173, 98)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (37, 173, 98)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 97)-sequence over F8, using
(64, 64+109, 144)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (64, 173, 144)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 173, 144)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 144, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 143)-sequence over F8, using
(64, 64+109, 2219)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 173, 2220)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 172, 2220)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 214826 750277 329016 084080 495859 261902 770739 410810 670590 974970 501590 486696 725591 502967 519607 318183 486186 235358 475372 363816 759242 904636 888676 378146 462968 124912 > 8172 [i]