Best Known (58−14, 58, s)-Nets in Base 8
(58−14, 58, 1172)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 58, 1172)-net over F8, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(858, 1172, F8, 14, 14) (dual of [(1172, 14), 16350, 15]-NRT-code), using
- OA 7-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(858, 8204, F8, 14) (dual of [8204, 8146, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(858, 8208, F8, 14) (dual of [8208, 8150, 15]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6429, 4104, F64, 14) (dual of [4104, 4075, 15]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(13) ⊂ Ce(10) [i] based on
- linear OA(6427, 4096, F64, 14) (dual of [4096, 4069, 15]-code), using an extension Ce(13) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,13], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 14 [i]
- linear OA(6421, 4096, F64, 11) (dual of [4096, 4075, 12]-code), using an extension Ce(10) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 642−1, defining interval I = [1,10], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 11 [i]
- linear OA(642, 8, F64, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(642, 64, F64, 2) (dual of [64, 62, 3]-code or 64-arc in PG(1,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(62,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(642, 64, F64, 2) (dual of [64, 62, 3]-code or 64-arc in PG(1,64)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(13) ⊂ Ce(10) [i] based on
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6429, 4104, F64, 14) (dual of [4104, 4075, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(858, 8208, F8, 14) (dual of [8208, 8150, 15]-code), using
- OA 7-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(858, 8204, F8, 14) (dual of [8204, 8146, 15]-code), using
(58−14, 58, 8666)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (44, 58, 8666)-net over F8, using
(58−14, 58, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 58, large)-net in base 8, because
- 12 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 46, large)-net in base 8, but