Best Known (24, 24+17, s)-Nets in Base 8
(24, 24+17, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 41, 208)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (24, 42, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 21, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 21, 104)-net over F64, using
(24, 24+17, 227)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (24, 41, 227)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(841, 227, F8, 17) (dual of [227, 186, 18]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(841, 228, F8, 17) (dual of [228, 187, 18]-code), using
- construction X with Varšamov bound [i] based on
- linear OA(840, 226, F8, 17) (dual of [226, 186, 18]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6420, 113, F64, 17) (dual of [113, 93, 18]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,95P) [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 113, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(6420, 113, F64, 17) (dual of [113, 93, 18]-code), using
- linear OA(840, 227, F8, 16) (dual of [227, 187, 17]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 840 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 467491 200582 635193 749145 627103 353328 [i]
- linear OA(80, 1, F8, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(80, s, F8, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(840, 226, F8, 17) (dual of [226, 186, 18]-code), using
- construction X with Varšamov bound [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(841, 228, F8, 17) (dual of [228, 187, 18]-code), using
(24, 24+17, 258)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(24, 41, 258)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (24, 42, 258)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (3, 21, 129)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 18, 129)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- the rational function field F128(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 128)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (0, 18, 129)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (3, 21, 129)-net in base 64, using
(24, 24+17, 17616)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 41, 17617)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 40, 17617)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1 329336 337460 156987 567956 303521 057134 > 840 [i]