Best Known (65−22, 65, s)-Nets in Base 8
(65−22, 65, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 65, 354)-net over F8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (43, 72, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 36, 177)-net over F64, using
(65−22, 65, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(43, 65, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on (42, 64, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (26, 48, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 24, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 24, 259)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (26, 48, 518)-net over F16, using
(65−22, 65, 784)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (43, 65, 784)-net over F8, using
(65−22, 65, 152173)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 65, 152174)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 50219 690853 310226 560088 047420 188532 869456 802122 327190 127914 > 865 [i]