Best Known (25, 25+22, s)-Nets in Base 8
(25, 25+22, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 47, 160)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (25, 48, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 80)-net over F64, using
(25, 25+22, 162)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (25, 47, 162)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (25, 48, 162)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 81)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 80)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 81)-net over F64, using
(25, 25+22, 5058)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 47, 5059)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 2 791470 230414 424936 377334 373558 038519 137664 > 847 [i]