Best Known (64, 64+25, s)-Nets in Base 8
(64, 64+25, 484)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 89, 484)-net over F8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on digital (63, 88, 484)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (12, 24, 130)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 12, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 12, 65)-net over F64, using
- digital (39, 64, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 32, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 32, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (12, 24, 130)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(64, 64+25, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(64, 89, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (64, 96, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 48, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 49, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 42, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 42, 288)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 49, 288)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 48, 288)-net in base 64, using
(64, 64+25, 3829)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (64, 89, 3829)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(889, 3829, F8, 25) (dual of [3829, 3740, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(889, 4097, F8, 25) (dual of [4097, 4008, 26]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4097 | 88−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−12,−11,…,12}|+1 = 26 (BCH-bound) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(889, 4097, F8, 25) (dual of [4097, 4008, 26]-code), using
(64, 64+25, 3169000)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 89, 3169001)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (64, 88, 3169001)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 29 642845 812393 080860 236228 287091 096265 742793 966317 248087 376102 456507 604871 571736 > 888 [i]