Best Known (62−29, 62, s)-Nets in Base 8
(62−29, 62, 160)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 62, 160)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (33, 64, 160)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 80)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 80, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 79)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 32, 80)-net over F64, using
(62−29, 62, 194)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (33, 62, 194)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 31, 97)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 96)-sequence over F64, using
(62−29, 62, 7426)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 62, 7427)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 61, 7427)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 12 282992 120836 894673 266768 330849 809272 932288 138171 406528 > 861 [i]