Best Known (55, 55+29, s)-Nets in Base 8
(55, 55+29, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 84, 354)-net over F8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (55, 96, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 48, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 48, 177)-net over F64, using
(55, 55+29, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(55, 84, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (34, 63, 518)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 64, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 32, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 32, 259)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 64, 518)-net over F16, using
(55, 55+29, 840)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (55, 84, 840)-net over F8, using
(55, 55+29, 195152)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 84, 195153)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (55, 83, 195153)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 904 653501 067806 821948 107770 124156 690273 699087 500281 960689 934290 902625 959576 > 883 [i]