Best Known (88−31, 88, s)-Nets in Base 8
(88−31, 88, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 88, 354)-net over F8, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (57, 100, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 50, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 50, 177)-net over F64, using
(88−31, 88, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(57, 88, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
(88−31, 88, 782)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (57, 88, 782)-net over F8, using
(88−31, 88, 158695)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 88, 158696)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 87, 158696)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 705407 595156 214925 679392 214686 830777 205362 904398 229401 142166 347005 340864 481876 > 887 [i]