Best Known (58, 58+31, s)-Nets in Base 8
(58, 58+31, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (58, 89, 354)-net over F8, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (58, 102, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 51, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 51, 177)-net over F64, using
(58, 58+31, 518)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(58, 89, 518)-net in base 8, using
- 81 times duplication [i] based on (57, 88, 518)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 259)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (35, 66, 518)-net over F16, using
(58, 58+31, 837)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (58, 89, 837)-net over F8, using
(58, 58+31, 182294)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (58, 89, 182295)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (58, 88, 182295)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 29 642788 501712 430862 452615 841040 261917 610417 345440 513791 283253 519827 755502 032000 > 888 [i]