MinT - Best Known (96−32, 96, s)-Nets in Base 8

Best Known (96−32, 96, s)-Nets in Base 8

(96−32, 96, 371)-Net over F₈ — Constructive and digital

Digital (64, 96, 371)-net over F₈, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (2, 18, 17)-net over F₈, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 16)-sequence over F₈, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 17, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
2. digital (46, 78, 354)-net over F₈, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 39, 177)-net over F₆₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F₆₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₆₄ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(96−32, 96, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive

(64, 96, 576)-net in base 8, using

trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 48, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 49, 288)-net in base 64, using
  - base change [i] based on digital (9, 42, 288)-net over F₁₂₈, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F₁₂₈, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₁₂₈ with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(96−32, 96, 1126)-Net over F₈ — Digital

Digital (64, 96, 1126)-net over F₈, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(96−32, 96, 254661)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s

There is no (64, 96, 254662)-net in base 8, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8^mÂ â‰¥ 497 327391 114957 102657 620079 227914 330436 160728 241843 332534 531689 679584 111344 947162 659940 > 8⁹⁶ [i]