Best Known (90, 90+32, s)-Nets in Base 8
(90, 90+32, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 122, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (90, 124, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 62, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 62, 513)-net over F64, using
(90, 90+32, 6369)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (90, 122, 6369)-net over F8, using
(90, 90+32, 7473108)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 122, 7473109)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 150 307002 392349 519701 264830 335577 777009 568782 679538 754330 985880 694008 737187 267300 072618 320356 353508 589122 910449 > 8122 [i]