Best Known (106−33, 106, s)-Nets in Base 8
(106−33, 106, 400)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (73, 106, 400)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 26, 46)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 45)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9, N(F) = 45, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 45)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (47, 80, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 40, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 40, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (10, 26, 46)-net over F8, using
(106−33, 106, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(73, 106, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (73, 112, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
(106−33, 106, 1808)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (73, 106, 1808)-net over F8, using
(106−33, 106, 820282)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (73, 106, 820283)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (73, 105, 820283)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 66750 007511 011642 794575 130792 616411 457686 447653 442723 273060 594994 523656 915517 227301 730963 400577 > 8105 [i]