Best Known (92, 92+33, s)-Nets in Base 8
(92, 92+33, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (92, 125, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (92, 128, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 64, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 64, 513)-net over F64, using
(92, 92+33, 6174)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (92, 125, 6174)-net over F8, using
(92, 92+33, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (92, 125, large)-net in base 8, because
- 31 times m-reduction [i] would yield (92, 94, large)-net in base 8, but