Best Known (95−34, 95, s)-Nets in Base 8
(95−34, 95, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 95, 354)-net over F8, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (61, 108, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 54, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 54, 177)-net over F64, using
(95−34, 95, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(61, 95, 516)-net in base 8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (61, 96, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (37, 72, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 36, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 36, 258)-net over F256, using
- base change [i] based on digital (37, 72, 516)-net over F16, using
(95−34, 95, 765)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (61, 95, 765)-net over F8, using
(95−34, 95, 114152)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 95, 114153)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 62 166611 822547 479557 739303 834022 855047 481682 628381 264595 513814 134937 145753 268091 994144 > 895 [i]