Best Known (109−35, 109, s)-Nets in Base 8
(109−35, 109, 389)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (74, 109, 389)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 25, 35)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 34)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7, N(F) = 34, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 34, using a function field by Sémirat [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 34)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (49, 84, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 42, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 42, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (8, 25, 35)-net over F8, using
(109−35, 109, 576)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(74, 109, 576)-net in base 8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (73, 109, 576)-net in base 8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (73, 112, 576)-net in base 8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 48, 288)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (17, 56, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (73, 112, 576)-net in base 8, using
(109−35, 109, 1536)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (74, 109, 1536)-net over F8, using
(109−35, 109, 559907)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (74, 109, 559908)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (74, 108, 559908)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 34 175833 269248 558241 576092 824025 211211 745149 592170 986123 030398 861916 429930 679951 200754 021549 486382 > 8108 [i]