Best Known (126−35, 126, s)-Nets in Base 8
(126−35, 126, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (91, 126, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 63, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
(126−35, 126, 4366)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (91, 126, 4366)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(8126, 4366, F8, 35) (dual of [4366, 4240, 36]-code), using
- 261 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 5 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 74 times 0, 1, 152 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(8121, 4100, F8, 35) (dual of [4100, 3979, 36]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(34) ⊂ Ce(33) [i] based on
- linear OA(8121, 4096, F8, 35) (dual of [4096, 3975, 36]-code), using an extension Ce(34) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,34], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 35 [i]
- linear OA(8117, 4096, F8, 34) (dual of [4096, 3979, 35]-code), using an extension Ce(33) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,33], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- linear OA(80, 4, F8, 0) (dual of [4, 4, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(80, s, F8, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(34) ⊂ Ce(33) [i] based on
- 261 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (2, 5 times 0, 1, 26 times 0, 1, 74 times 0, 1, 152 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(8121, 4100, F8, 35) (dual of [4100, 3979, 36]-code), using
(126−35, 126, 4479336)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (91, 126, 4479337)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (91, 125, 4479337)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 76957 135128 734330 661008 059105 869779 170333 037325 443776 342167 903726 149358 308964 219918 405846 861621 842776 744315 356576 > 8125 [i]