Best Known (44, 44+35, s)-Nets in Base 8
(44, 44+35, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 79, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 82, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 41, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 41, 104)-net over F64, using
(44, 44+35, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (44, 79, 258)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 80, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 40, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 40, 129)-net over F64, using
(44, 44+35, 14259)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 79, 14260)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 78, 14260)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 27607 443950 147613 621926 088234 572192 897070 808314 818149 219006 285180 633891 > 878 [i]