Best Known (146−36, 146, s)-Nets in Base 8
(146−36, 146, 1035)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (110, 146, 1035)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 18, 9)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 8)-sequence over F8, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the rational function field F8(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 8)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (92, 128, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 64, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 64, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (0, 18, 9)-net over F8, using
(146−36, 146, 11641)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (110, 146, 11641)-net over F8, using
(146−36, 146, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (110, 146, large)-net in base 8, because
- 34 times m-reduction [i] would yield (110, 112, large)-net in base 8, but