Best Known (66, 66+38, s)-Nets in Base 8
(66, 66+38, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 104, 354)-net over F8, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (66, 118, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 59, 177)-net over F64, using
(66, 66+38, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(66, 104, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (40, 78, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 39, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 39, 258)-net over F256, using
(66, 66+38, 742)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (66, 104, 742)-net over F8, using
(66, 66+38, 99379)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 104, 99380)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 8344 907892 897408 011075 669544 622820 218486 658345 384113 057396 123379 910049 854843 432234 630577 016577 > 8104 [i]