Best Known (96, 96+38, s)-Nets in Base 8
(96, 96+38, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 134, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (96, 136, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
(96, 96+38, 4118)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (96, 134, 4118)-net over F8, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(8134, 4118, F8, 38) (dual of [4118, 3984, 39]-code), using
- 17 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 16 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(8133, 4100, F8, 38) (dual of [4100, 3967, 39]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(37) ⊂ Ce(36) [i] based on
- linear OA(8133, 4096, F8, 38) (dual of [4096, 3963, 39]-code), using an extension Ce(37) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,37], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 38 [i]
- linear OA(8129, 4096, F8, 37) (dual of [4096, 3967, 38]-code), using an extension Ce(36) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 84−1, defining interval I = [1,36], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 37 [i]
- linear OA(80, 4, F8, 0) (dual of [4, 4, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(80, s, F8, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(37) ⊂ Ce(36) [i] based on
- 17 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 16 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(8133, 4100, F8, 38) (dual of [4100, 3967, 39]-code), using
(96, 96+38, 2650186)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 134, 2650187)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 10 329004 795040 589292 190540 606666 074148 269342 560504 899196 656044 591266 421389 782233 585150 317522 299716 672210 831361 570528 482752 > 8134 [i]