Best Known (108−39, 108, s)-Nets in Base 8
(108−39, 108, 354)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (69, 108, 354)-net over F8, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (69, 124, 354)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 62, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 62, 177)-net over F64, using
(108−39, 108, 516)-Net in Base 8 — Constructive
(69, 108, 516)-net in base 8, using
- base change [i] based on digital (42, 81, 516)-net over F16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 82, 516)-net over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 41, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 41, 258)-net over F256, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (42, 82, 516)-net over F16, using
(108−39, 108, 810)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (69, 108, 810)-net over F8, using
(108−39, 108, 138007)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (69, 108, 138008)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (69, 107, 138008)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 4 272179 357116 208085 291009 000013 280059 655853 314873 864788 391312 191939 964883 228878 821034 256811 790649 > 8107 [i]