Best Known (97, 97+39, s)-Nets in Base 8
(97, 97+39, 1026)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (97, 136, 1026)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (97, 138, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 69, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 69, 513)-net over F64, using
(97, 97+39, 3682)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (97, 136, 3682)-net over F8, using
(97, 97+39, 2956703)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (97, 136, 2956704)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (97, 135, 2956704)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 82 632322 473691 326950 223732 783214 657785 144061 850314 537994 247273 683795 220188 801832 648642 223009 330763 158420 758352 466142 541931 > 8135 [i]