Best Known (127, 127+40, s)-Nets in Base 8
(127, 127+40, 1074)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (127, 167, 1074)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 31, 48)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 47)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (96, 136, 1026)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (11, 31, 48)-net over F8, using
(127, 127+40, 16215)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (127, 167, 16215)-net over F8, using
(127, 127+40, large)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (127, 167, large)-net in base 8, because
- 38 times m-reduction [i] would yield (127, 129, large)-net in base 8, but