Best Known (33, 33+41, s)-Nets in Base 8
(33, 33+41, 70)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (33, 74, 70)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 24, 25)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 24)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 24)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (9, 50, 45)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (4, 24, 25)-net over F8, using
(33, 33+41, 97)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (33, 74, 97)-net over F8, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 74, 97)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 96)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 97, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 96)-sequence over F8, using
(33, 33+41, 2334)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (33, 74, 2335)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (33, 73, 2335)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 845949 929876 548906 268670 740127 958130 420348 020241 639378 407493 659847 > 873 [i]