Best Known (51, 51+42, s)-Nets in Base 8
(51, 51+42, 208)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 93, 208)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 96, 208)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 48, 104)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 103)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 48, 104)-net over F64, using
(51, 51+42, 258)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (51, 93, 258)-net over F8, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (51, 94, 258)-net over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 47, 129)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 129, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 128)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 47, 129)-net over F64, using
(51, 51+42, 12369)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 93, 12370)-net in base 8, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 972870 717623 457997 544820 816544 288848 991020 278159 387881 189563 201686 343163 041923 805648 > 893 [i]