Best Known (78−43, 78, s)-Nets in Base 8
(78−43, 78, 74)-Net over F8 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 78, 74)-net over F8, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 21, 9)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 8)-sequence over F8, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the rational function field F8(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 8)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (14, 57, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- digital (0, 21, 9)-net over F8, using
(78−43, 78, 112)-Net over F8 — Digital
Digital (35, 78, 112)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (35, 111)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 35 and N(F) ≥ 112, using
(78−43, 78, 2526)-Net in Base 8 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 78, 2527)-net in base 8, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 77, 2527)-net in base 8, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3468 556295 227774 314553 376043 899117 607622 202485 251670 021314 073103 713730 > 877 [i]